The Royal Representative - Latest Comments

Re: An Explanation

guentherfocke — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:36:45 -0000

Yhis text speaks for it self.

This is an extract of my book: Not In Her Majesty's Service

» So is it all about continuity? «, Arthur added, » what do you think would happen if the British Crown abdicates and the Vatican completely turned into a Museum?«

» A financial chaos! «, was Miguel’s reply, » Tourism, the hotel industry, the airline industry, dealing in art and a lot more would collapse. «

» What would Rome be without the Vatican? « Mill asked, »what about all the art treasures in the Palazzo Vecchio in Florence, what about Michelangelo or Rafael without the Pope? The same would occur for London and its traditional allies. Without the British Crown all around us would, all of a sudden, belong to the past and all of us would only be museum guards of our nations«.

» And there is more, my friends, there is more «, Arthur warned lifting his forefinger, » a part of our own perception would get lost. Important personalities like the British Crown and the Pope in Rome represent living metaphors of our culture and history of our civilisation. They silently bear our thoughts and feelings by speaking and acting to the world expressing our own perception of things. You should also bear in mind that the Queen is not only
Queen of England, but also head of the Anglican Church and the Commonwealth. Top secret documents go via her office. Her Majesty furthermore connects Canada, Great Britain and Australia. The importance of the Pope in Rome is indisputable, especially during these times of religious conflicts between Christians, Jews and Muslims.«
About me:
I am a private detective for over 40 years with mutable skills and credentials.
I am a supporter of freedom, against dictatorship and oppression.
I am also in favor of monarchy; with a little more power to the monarch.

Re: Mac is Back!

MandysRoyalty — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:09:24 -0000

They really are great, aren't they? :)

Re: Mac is Back!

jonathanwthomas — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:36:13 -0000

Awesome! Congrats! Mac is the way to go! I've been a Mac user for almost ten years now. I wouldn't have it any other way!

Re: Picture of the Moment: Chapeau Royale

cltexas — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 09:55:52 -0000

What would she look like with a chimney on her?

Re: Come and bask in Anglotopia

jonathanwthomas — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:14:46 -0000

Thank you for such a wonderful write up. We're so excited to have you writing for Anglotopia!

Re: Who’s taking the business of Monarchy seriously?

MandysRoyalty — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:00:17 -0000

I thought William would be more serious, but after the past few years, I don't hold out hope, either. Diana wasn't a very good role model for either Prince, and of course, she's the one they take after. Instead of being serious like Charles, they party and holiday like their mother did. Beatrice and Eugenie are the same way. *sigh*

Re: Who’s taking the business of Monarchy seriously?

marilynbraun — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:53:36 -0000

I think there's a certain 'damned if they do, damned if they don't,' where younger members of the family are concerned. Anytime I've read any type of commentary regarding Beatrice and Eugenie it's how they're a waste of taxpayers money with the cost of their security guards. They try but I don't think people take them seriously. Whenever I see them carry out engagements, I always think they must be twiddling their thumbs waiting for invitations. It's up to William and Harry to carry the torch and I don't hold out a lot of hope.

Re: Judaism vs. Protestantism

marilynbraun — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:29:44 -0000

As high profile they may be I think in the case of the Trumps/Kushner families that it would be regarded as more of a private thing. What they do with their lives doesn't make headlines like the royal family. I would dare say that outside of New York society that their reach is limited, unless of course The Donald gets married again or some tragedy/scandal befalls one of them (Marla Maples anyone?) If it weren't for The Apprentice I don't think anyone would really pay much attention. I know that Ivanka was in Vanity Fair and Hello! Canada but I don't think the conversion compares to the Act of Settlement.

In this day and age of political correctness, I do think the Act is discriminatory. I'm sure that there was a reason for it (I don't recall what though) but it isn't applicable now. It's interesting that William can marry anyone else but a Catholic. However I'm guessing that there would be a major uproar over him choosing say a Muslim or even marrying outside of his race. While people are making a big deal of it there would be an uncurrent of racism - unspoken but there. Then the whole Catholic thing would look quite harmless to people and the powers that be, now wouldn't it? ;)

Re: Judaism vs. Protestantism

MandysRoyalty — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:22:16 -0000

Peter and Autumn are a good example. A lot of people expressed disappointment that she converted to the Anglican faith, and stated she shouldn't have done it just to please the royals.

The Kushners are not royalty and neither are the Trumps, but as highly visible people, their blatant exclusion of anyone who isn't Jewish seems to run along the same lines as the Royal preference for non-Catholics and the Anglican faith. If people are so concerned, why aren't they complaining about the Kushners, too? If it's not right for royalty to discriminate, why not hold everyone to the same standard? Or, can we just consider this a private family matter that really doesn't affect anyone?

Re: Judaism vs. Protestantism

marilynbraun — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:12:59 -0000

I'm not sure that people give the Act of Settlement much thought until it comes into question. The most recent example being Catholic Autumn Kelly marrying Peter Philips. She converted just in time for Peter to keep his academic place in line but otherwise people proabably don't consider it. Just like male primogeniture, it doesn't become an issue until a royal baby is born. If that child is a boy then leave things as they are, if it's a girl then "hurry up and change the law!!!".. ;)

Re: William and Kate: Is it time?

marilynbraun — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:04:46 -0000

Yes, lots of predictions about when the wedding will happen - might as well use a Magic 8 ball! ;)

As much as I'd love to see a 2011 wedding I don't think they would have it at the same time as Victoria and Daniel. The interest William and Kate's wedding would totally overshadow the Swedish one. However, it's not as if it hasn't been done before. Mary and Frederick of Denmark were married a little over a week before Letizia and Felipe of Spain. The Spanish couple even attended their wedding!

Re: “Princess” training for the everyday girl

thereadingjourney — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:07:30 -0000

This sounds like a book that every young woman in today's society could benefit from reading. I hope that it does well and that readers take the advice to heart.

Re: Queen Rania: Power to the people

MandysRoyalty — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:32:44 -0000

She is amazing. I really admire her work and the stamina she must have. Although that holiday in Italy must've helped! ;)

Re: Queen Rania: Power to the people

affy7ann — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:23:21 -0000

Queen Rania is an awesome woman and amazing queen! =)

Re: Belgium Brings Surprises

MandysRoyalty — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 08:59:05 -0000

That's great! I will keep an eye out for more. They look like a nice family. If you have any information about them, feel free to send it along. :)

Re: Belgium Brings Surprises

Matterhorn — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:41:46 -0000

Great story! But really, the Belgian royals have always had alot of personality!

Re: New Lightbox Feature

smittenbybritain — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:51:43 -0000

Hi,
Thanks for stopping by my blog. I would be honored by the add. Ta!

Re: Gordon Ramsey: Caricature

caricature — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:54:19 -0000

It's funny!!

Re: Charlotte Casiraghi’s First Interview – Stade2

chaton — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:53:06 -0000

c'est avec plaisir que je découvre la voix de Charlotte , bravo et je t'embrasse et t'encourage pour ta performance et bisoussssssss mon doux Albie

Re: Monaco Royalty: Photos

MandysRoyalty — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:37:56 -0000

If anyone knows how to get rid of the awful pink boxes surrounding thumbnails, please let me know. It looks hideous! :D

Re: Monaco Royalty: Photos

chaton — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:37:43 -0000

famille je vous aime bisoussss

Re: July 1st: Diana, Princess of Wales Born

Matterhorn — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:45:33 -0000

What a sad story.

Re: Burke’s Peerage Including Illegitimate Children

Viola — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:27:03 -0000

This might put a spanner in the works! There is a theory that an Australian noble should be King because of his ancestry - can you imagine! At least there'll be a Danish Queen from Tasmania one day.

Re: Burke’s Peerage Including Illegitimate Children

mandysroyalty — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:03:02 -0000

Albert may be given a run for his money when this edition comes out...

Re: Burke’s Peerage Including Illegitimate Children

mandysroyalty — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:02:29 -0000

Albert may be given a run for his money when this edition comes out. Now we'll see who's really related to whom.